God, I don't even know how to react to that
Clearly, they don't understand what privilege means.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io@tdverstynen i jeszcze
Yea when you're giving that response it pretty much proves the point.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @bradpwyble@azhir_io i jeszcze
Ooooor they do understand what it (white privilege) means, and they deny it exists, exactly so they can keep using white supremacy to have a good life.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @o_guest@bradpwyble i jeszcze
Tbh, the one thing i at least respect about them, is they’re at least honest about their ignorance/ questionable views. Other kind of only superficially acknowledged it, which sometimes I find more destructive.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io@bradpwyble i jeszcze
Kinda honest, but yes, I agree. The real analysis here is that he wants to call Black people the n-word.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
Basically when you see his utterance above you can think to yourself like a philosopher under what universe does his analysis obtain? Only 2, I think, both of which are more white supremacist than we have now, which is saying something.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
He either wants white people never to be called "white", totally destroying any useful/healthy discussion around whiteness & colonialism. Or (mutually inclusively if he's irrational, which he is) he wants to just call everybody slurs, esp. Black people. Both are palingenetic.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
For "obtains" used this way, see:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_affairs_(philosophy) …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @o_guest@bradpwyble i jeszcze
Oh yeh, forgot the discussion was about Steve Salerno. Ended-up focusing on Brads story. Yeh, Steve Salerno had a platform so his rhetoric is pretty destructive. Going to read the wiki you sent me, haven't heard of 'state of affairs' before.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io@bradpwyble i jeszcze
It's not about anything. Just philosophy. Only read if you're bothered.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Okay, so the state of affair is a like a the way the 'actual world' must be in order for a proposition to be true?
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io@bradpwyble i jeszcze
Absolutely.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
It's like if I say: All trees are mammals. An oak is a tree. Therefore, an oak is a mammal. It's not a logical fallacy, it's just it doesn't obtain in this universe.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
