to 
I'm uncomfortable with the idea of paying peer reviewers for a number of reasons.https://twitter.com/jeffreybrainard/status/1366416983131119622 …
Pokaż ten wątek
-
I don't think it's the same, no. Peer review and science publishing is a small, monopolised section of a wider open economy. But ask an expert.
Providing a reviewer with a stipend doesn't create a conflict of interest. What prevents more many academics from being part of the review process is the extra-work load for no pay, which in fact is gatekeeping.
-
-
Also we can't forget that profit margins of journals is one of the highest in the business. Journals are constantly hiking up the price to extract more revenue from a trapped user base. Providing a reviewer a basic salary for their labour doesn't impact this at all.
Dziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.