Is there evidence based literature on how to set fair and consistent exams? Preferably not too long. I feel like this is the sort of thing I ought to know. Like, better to have more shorter questions or fewer in depth ones, etc.?
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @neuralreckoning
Fewer in depth ones, and favor open book exams, where what is being graded is not retention of information but rather ability to apply it to solving a problem or exploring a question.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @WorldImagining
That's broadly what I do based on my intuition, but is it just guesswork or is there evidence to support that?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @neuralreckoning @WorldImagining
There’s a lot of papers I can reference you — exam equity / alternative assessment methods was something I was heavily involved with for years. This is just a nice summary. https://cei.umn.edu/support-services/tutorials/integrated-aligned-course-design-course-design-resources/alternative …
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12170 … https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2190/GYMQ-78FA-WMTX-J06C … https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191491X10000039 … https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13562517.2014.882894 … Hope this helps.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione
any good course should have a combination of assessment methods. Those w/ certain disabilities perform disproportionately poorly in certain assessment methods, while fine in others. Different assessment types benefit different people. Sadly, this isn’t standard practice yet.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
