I know this is scary, but doing a PhD while on a FB salary = the dream. It’s only a few PhDs. Not everyone wants to be a career academic, why not just see this plays out and give people the option? ___ Personally, we should be giving students the choice.https://twitter.com/mikarv/status/1364370161822818304 …
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @azhir_io
Some PhD sectors pay highly enhanced stipends, distributed by a uni (eg pharma). It doesn’t mean the pharma company can limit research by in effect making continual funding conditional on not speaking out against them. What’s happening here isn’t necessary for better funding.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
You don’t give employees the offer of more money for the waiver of being able to join a union. Similarly, it’s unfair to tie young researchers’ hands before they start just because they want (or need!) more funding. You can fund more but maintain basic standards and ethics.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @mikarv
I think this is idealistic, I don’t see it happening. Universities in general have pretty appalling reputation for abuse, also academic careers are pushed by an attempt to publish in prestigious journals.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @azhir_io
But it already happens in other sectors, such as pharmaceuticals. My point is that universities should be in a position of negotiating power with firms to have funding + independence, but roll over — in part bc the faculty also employed at them have blurred the lines so much!
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Yup. This is a valid point. I’m actually unsure which side is better for students. I’ve slowly come to the opinion private companies are disruptive and force change. While I’ve seen universities remain stagnant for decades.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
