to 
Talk to alumni, too. They are not bound by the same power dynamics that bind current students.https://twitter.com/sarahchasins/status/1361781177661747204 …
-
I genuinely think the best way is too look at what a supervisors requirements — you can read a lot into a person by what they look for from others. Then how many of their students are from underrepresented / marginalised backgrounds. Finally how many people are similar to you?
If they’re sexist, men wouldn’t have noticed. If they’re racist, white people wouldn’t have noticed. If they’re classist, the middle-class wouldn’t have noticed. If they’re ableist, the able-bodied wouldn’t have noticed. — Look for those like you, that they have supervised
-
-
I think that's important, but doesn't tell the full story. The pattern of abuse isn't always clear especially with such a small sample size. Like a sexist and abusive professor might abuse a dude but then later be extra nice to his first woman student to prove he "isn't sexist."
-
One thing about abuse in general is that abusers are often not abusive to everyone they interact with, even everyone who meets the same set of criteria. Might just be a matter of having supply from a different place in the abuser's life at the time or something similar.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.