You seem upset.
I think you might just be struggling to understand the graph. I found it pretty intuitive. I can always provide you some background reading if that helps?


I.e it is diagram to convey ideas. So there's isn't a conventional x-axis. I think there's just a lot of foundational concepts in data visualisation that it might be helpful to first learn. Maybe some wider reading would help.
-
-
To me the question suggests you're struggling to interpret the diagram. Which is fine
I remember in my youth when I had so many questions and misconceptions. Keep at it, you'll get there! 
-
Oh mate, sex isn't a spectrum is it? If something foundational to your beliefs isn't real maybe have a think about that?
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
So the diagram fails in its primary objective to show sex as a spectrum because it is unable to characterise that spectrum. Instead it is quite misleading by plotting both the to sexes and aneuploidies *as if* they formed some sort of ordered continuum even with a rainbow...
-
… bar across the back. The fact is that sex is not a spectrum, it is a discrete description of *functional* role in reproduction based on gamete types. This is what biologists mean by a sex. But the chart fails to make that clear.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
