to 
Yes. But he has no convincing argument that we are IO limited.
-
of course, if he spectacularly crashes then that would create neuro-winter but I hope he is too good to not sell even minor breakthrough and to be fair he don't abandon his ideas out of whim
I don’t think if he crashes it’ll change the outcome. Tesla had multiple failures!He’ll just just pivot.
Neuralink is good for science b/c
1)increases public awareness
2)draws VC capital
3)pushes market competition
This all unlocks more opportunities for labs/academics! 
-
-
It's been discussed after the neuralink demo and it's not clear cut that this is great for the field. Musk makes wild claims about what is novel, while labs that have been working for years on this technology (and have mature/awesome products) are ignored. >
-
I'm also (still) not convinced that public awareness is great if it's deeply oversold. People (and VCs and grant agencies) only have so much appetite for claims that don't deliver. Musk may just end up briefly eclipsing the long-running efforts in this area. >
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.