It depends on many life factors that are unknowable. Someone may face a myriad of personal challenges not visible in the public sphere that drains their ability to do much more than get by.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @bradpwyble @atypical_me i jeszcze
I get that there may be few with genuine barriers preventing them from acting on their beliefs, but wouldn't you agree that's rather an exception than the norm?
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @atypical_me i jeszcze
How we go about science reform affects how it will turn out. If your approach is to assume the worst and shame for mere inaction according to your preferences, the atmosphere, and the result, will become toxic.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @bradpwyble @atypical_me i jeszcze
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 podał/a dalej Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎
It’s not “mere inaction” if that’s the primary enabler of a toxic enterprise Can we write off university admins enabling a predatory rockstar prof as “mere inaction”? We need to make academic Ponzi scheme as unacceptable as sexual harassmenthttps://twitter.com/Raamana_/status/1345184627456143361?s=20 …
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 dodał/a,
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 @Raamana_W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @atypical_me i jeszcze 6osóbits amazing how people forget that we routinely employ public shaming as a tactic to achieve desired change.. a touchy/controversial analogy is this one (with all due respect and importance to the Me Too movement): https://twitter.com/Raamana_/status/1332071005318164485?s=20 …2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @bradpwyble i jeszcze
As an example: how many ppl do you estimate were convinced to stop hoarding data as a result of the twitter mobbing of Jack Gallant, as opposed to disengaging from and distrusting the open science community?
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @atypical_me @bradpwyble i jeszcze
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 podał/a dalej Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎
let me try get us back to my original question: why is public shaming okay to achieve changes in sexual harassment policies but not okay in dismantling academic ponzi schemes?https://twitter.com/Raamana_/status/1345184627456143361?s=20 …
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 dodał/a,
Future Distinguished Emeritus Prof Pradeep Reddy 😎 @Raamana_W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @atypical_me i jeszcze 6osóbits amazing how people forget that we routinely employ public shaming as a tactic to achieve desired change.. a touchy/controversial analogy is this one (with all due respect and importance to the Me Too movement): https://twitter.com/Raamana_/status/1332071005318164485?s=20 …2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @bradpwyble i jeszcze
Sexual harassment, esp. with a power imbalance, is a clear reprehensible behaviour, and often illegal. Public shaming in this instance restores the imbalance of power. (Tho it is still not the ideal solution). There is no equivalence imo to, e.g., publishing choices.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @atypical_me @bradpwyble i jeszcze
why isn't there an equivalence? both are reprehensible harassment -- as a mentor & friend for many intl students, I know toxic advisors inflict non-negligible pain (much more mental than physical) even in relation to sexual harassment; with "scars" that stay with you forever!!
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @atypical_me i jeszcze
pain and abuse from toxic supervisors is one of the highest pains I and many other PhD students faced in their life. many academics are desensitized abt it - almost to the point that exploiting trainees is INDEED acceptable (in fact encouraged to sustain the Ponzi scheme)
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @bradpwyble i jeszcze
Maybe you should specify what sort of behaviour you're talking about. My assumption was publication practices...
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
I was of the opinion it about overall culture in academia. How publishing culture is a product of and as also reinforces existing power dynamics that need to be challenged. How publishing in prestigious journals can the only focus of some labs; thus bad for science overall.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
