Don't confuse inaction on this with an unwillingness to help improve science. I spent my free time on NMC and NMA this year, which is a different way of improving the community.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do to @bradpwyble @atypical_me i jeszcze
my bad, I didn't mean it personally to you Brad at all (i generally never make personal comments as a matter of policy, except in egregious situations). I do hear this refrains so routinely in the reform debates it frustrates me.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @atypical_me i jeszcze
I totally get that, and I agree that we need energy from all corners to push reforms on all fronts (although we also have to be strategic given our limited free time).
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 4 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @bradpwyble @Raamana_ i jeszcze
I believe the system we have is actually pretty good. Not locally. But long term. I'll eventually write a simulation paper to convince
@GunnarBlohm3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @KordingLab @bradpwyble i jeszcze
I’m not sure about the current system. As increasingly we’re seeing a privatisation of research. On top of that many are leaving academia for big tech due to a perception that their rapid advancements are being made elswhere. Due to burdensome levels of red tape in academia.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io @KordingLab i jeszcze
It’s actually a good thing people are leaving the academy — we need to stop the overproduction of PhDs and postdocs, to give every graduate a fighting chance for a faculty position after their PhD without being in the rich club or doing many postdocs
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @KordingLab i jeszcze
That may be true, though their reasons for leaving academia isn’t great. There has to be a better balance. Couldn’t increasing collaboration with the private sector and funnelling VC money into labs also create more faculty jobs? (This is becoming more common in the U.K.).
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do to @azhir_io @KordingLab i jeszcze
Not an expert on this topic but I haven’t seen industry helping create faculty jobs — they mostly throw money and resources at those who are already “superstars” and promise them real profit for their business.. so I wouldn’t want industry to be the steward of science
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do to @Raamana_ @KordingLab i jeszcze
I should point out I’m sort of in the VC and start-up bubble. Thus definitely biases my perspective. I like the idea of a VC backed funds that distribute grants as a UBI. The value captured from commercialisation being returned to the fund, incentivising further investment.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
Why would they prefer that over pick and choose?
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Geometric growth and randomness are intrinsic to funds. This ensure they are random and diverse. Defo flaws but if there’s a return there will be investors. VCs aren’t great at judging investments in labs - asymmetry of info. Graph shows distribution of returns.pic.twitter.com/ixq4oqapOm
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
