We wrote about the "what, when, and why?" of t-processes: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v33/shah14.pdf . Implementation isn't much more difficult. There are nuanced trade-offs. The uncertainty and dependencies are subtly different and sometimes preferable, the noise model is less interpretable. https://twitter.com/GarridoMerchan/status/1342899907989032961 …
Which situations do you think a t-process would be preferable over GP with Bayesian treatment of scale?
-
-
We address the question in depth in the paper. It's actually quite subtle and hard to give a short take. They're mostly useful when you have a small number of observations (e.g. BayesOpt with a really expensive objective). But there is more to the story.
-
In 5.1.1 you discuss the LL and MSE for TP vs GP. The results on spatial and wine data were particularly noteworthy; with the TP having lower MSE scores and ridiculously high LL scores. I wasn't sure why this was the case.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
