A person who is a member of a marginalized group but who for whatever reason is less harmed than others in the group by the marginalization is not therefore identical to a member of the oppressor class/group that the marginalization is designed to serve
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @IBJIYONGI
I don’t know about this. Depends how disconnected one is from the community. Interplay between class, wealth, etc. The oppressed can rise to become oppressors. Perpetuating the cycle. A wealthy POC is not an ally to the working-class POC. And may sides with the oppressor
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @azhir_io @IBJIYONGI
The further up the social-ladder we climb, the more disconnected we become from marginalised communities. We still experience harm, but if we’re not careful we can perpetuate class oppression and be used by oppressors as token examples. I think Malcolm X hinted this in 1963pic.twitter.com/1mlVfZ0hGV
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @azhir_io
You’re over reading. I didn’t say people can’t perpetuate harm. You don’t need to be particularly powerful to do that either.
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 10 polubionych
Ah fair point. I guess I did read into it. I saw it as a protection for wealthy POC from criticisms from working-class POC. I guess it was literally just pointing out that all marginalised people suffer oppression - at varying levels.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
