I find it hard to write about actual trees in a paper/ grant we are currently working on. Trees are so common to comp/neuro and ML that it is hard to see trees as having green leaves as opposed to structures where vertices are connected by exactly one path.
Awesome. Btw, what do you think of Theoretical Neuroscience by Peter Dayan?
I’ve been flicking through, but it’s super dense. I get the impressions it’s more of book to reference.
http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~lmate/biblio/dayanabbott.pdf …
-
-
I love it. Helps having physics background I think
-
Hahaha - well good thing I have a physics background then!
I’m just reading it for fun at the moment, in my spare time. He’s got a few problems, I just probably need to try them out.
Good to know I’m reading the right sorts of stuff.
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
to 
