Yes, I have HGC up on my 2nd monitor whenever it's running! :) I'm curious, what changes would you propose if you wanted to nudge Blaze more towards the main tank role?
-
Arthas and Garrosh do that by hard countering melee heroes (i basically die if I'm melee with one of those heroes as kerrigan and they don't die in cc for example) , Johanna has a lot of disruption on short cd + still a reliable engage post 10How do you think blaze fits this role
That was just a general statement on the definition of a MT, not specifically Blaze. I'm just trying to see if the narrative that not every MT fulfills exactly the same criteria is valid. I think Blaze doesn't have the best engage but he has enough tools to compensate for it.
-
-
I mean the best example is Tyrael. He doesn't have a reliable engage himself he enables the entire rest of his team to engage for themselves, essentially. THAT is weird. But Blaze is falling into the very typical mold here except for the reliable part against top tier players.
-
So would you say that nerfing the slow back down but making his E windup faster would make him a main tank?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I do think there is more then one way to achieve the goal of engaging outside of hard CC, but how much and how reliable is the counterplay is an aspect that just has to be considered balancing for pro.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think they fit the criteria , Muradin and Garrosh for example obviously excel at really different things The problem imo is that blaze neither does everything a tank can do correctly nor does he excel in one particular aspect like arthas or garrosh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.