Muradin has a delay on his stun, ETC has a delay on his stun, Johanna has a delay on her stun, Anub'arak has a delay on his stun, and so on and so forth.
-
muradin only has one hard cc if he goes avatar but his jump is on a separate spell. So if blaze misses E he has no escape and no cc while if muradin misses stun he can jump away
With that same logic though, Diablo and Anub'arak are in the same boat though if they misplay their engage. Same with Garrosh. If you use your engage in a suboptimal way, you will need to find a way out and none of these characters have one on a "separate" button.
-
-
As cavalierguest mentionned in his video anub has no counterplay for his engage , and you play him in one shot comps + he still has Q and cocoon to self peel after E. Garrosh doesn't really have an engage similar to blaze and anub but if he misses Q he can still 1/2
-
threaten melees with taunt and E (+ stun a ranged post 16) , still has unstoppable too. Big difference between garrosh and blaze tho is that that garrosh has ~3 sec cc with short windup + displacement to punish people going on him which is his niche
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd strongly argue Anub is an even worse position, but at least he can QE, he doesn't have to EQ every time. Blaze will have to WE every time, there is no way to play cautiously. But Anub's engage is completely reliable, big difference. The risk vs reward is there for him.
-
Diablo is basically unkillable, you can make a lot of mistakes on him and be fine. Which is, just like Anub's fragility, a valid way to balance heroes. I just don't think Blaze has a reliable enough engage for his drawbacks at the pro level (fwiw on ladder I think Blaze can tank)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.