Alright Junkrat aficionados, I need your opinion. What is your go-to Level 16 talent?
-
-
Endless Nade I think is the general pick but Spread Volley has some regular super strong situations for it, like when you need more burst or things like BoE race :) I imagine Burst Fire has significantly lower pick rate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I could totaly belive it and i think that all have their place. I think it's mostly a preference thing. Want to zone something? Spread Volley, Enemys stacking alot? Endless Nades. You have good lockdown, Burstfire to kill it quick. Either way doesn't change how fun he is to play
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
110% believe it, although I'm curious if prior talent choices (eg at level 4) make any substantive difference. Feeling like I should go for that traps + burst fire build more frequently.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Burst Fire always feels awful to me, but the other two I easily believe. Would be curious how combinations of 1, 4, 7, and 16 adjust things. If I wanted to write an article on winrates vs perception could I ask you some questions?
-
I sent you a DM.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would never think burst had same wr
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is WR that valid when a talent has a low pick rate? If its a niche pick, maybe the WR is good because enemies dont know how to deal with it?
-
It means that perception doesn't always match reality. People automatically think it's bad, but that might not actually be the case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
okay but at what level of play? you gave no context for the data you used to come to that conclusion. im a big believer in this kind of data but have a look at the last 10 weeks of master gameplay: https://i.imgur.com/D3pbP3x.png to further we dont know the prior talent choices they made
-
and i dont have access to the level of data you do, but the sample sizes for those win percents is enough
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.