our team sent in corrections, and they even made a few of them because they were so egregious, but failed to actually indicate on the article that a correction had been made. like, what?? i couldn't believe it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
i remember being livid and feeling so helpless. as a writer, i wanted to tweet and write and fight against the completely irresponsible coverage i was reading. the gap between what was happening in court and in the paper was so wide.
Show this thread -
when the DA's star witness (this was in '18) admitted to lying FIVE different times on the stand during cross-examination, THAT should've been the headline of the next story. that should have been *IN* the story, at least! no. they just kept recycling the same DA talking points.
Show this thread -
anyway. these things have consequences. lazy reporting leads to misinformation being spread and aggregated. even
@theappeal (which i really respect and love!!) has printed inaccurate information about my partner's case, because of this shoddy SF reporting.Show this thread -
i don't blame them. how could their reporters know that wasn't the whole story or an accurate picture of what happened, when it was printed in a "reputable" paper?!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.