@avibryant @patrickc I missed that line. In that case: kudos to the author of that post.
-
-
Replying to @Eigenvariable
@Eigenvariable@patrickc I don't buy that argument in Scala's case, though. The design space is so huge and varied that it's paralyzing.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @avibryant
@avibryant@Eigenvariable@patrickc I'll take the other side of "the age of dynamic languages is over" bet any day of the week.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattknox
@mattknox@avibryant@patrickc Sadly, I agree with you. It's better read as "gee, I wish the age of dynamic languages would start waning."1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Eigenvariable
@Eigenvariable@avibryant@patrickc I get that you like types, but surely you want more people programming?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattknox
@Eigenvariable@avibryant@patrickc and that most beginners are not category theorists? ;)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mattknox
@mattknox@avibryant@patrickc This is a straw man. Understanding category theory isn't particularly useful for understanding types.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Eigenvariable
@Eigenvariable@avibryant@patrickc category theory was a ;). But all the beginner-friendly languages I know of are dynamic.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattknox
@mattknox@Eigenvariable@patrickc scratch is static, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@mattknox @Eigenvariable @patrickc you can't drag a (round) numeric value into a (diamond?)-shaped boolean hole in an if/else clause.
-
-
Replying to @avibryant
Jeff Sarnat Retweeted Artur Adib
@avibryant@mattknox@patrickc This conversation has now looped back onto itself: https://twitter.com/r2r/status/672123105905672192 ….Jeff Sarnat added,
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.