And, equally naturally, this leads to discussion about whether the legalism is valid: http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/57303/what-is-the-hallachic-definition-of-randomness …
-
-
-
"I assume that a hallachic standard of randomness would be more lax than a standard of randomness in crytography..."
-
@avibryant “For the bench, randomness is Bayesian … But for KosherLight, randomness is frequentist.”
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@avibryant Remarkably similar to the sense in which "Natural Family Planning" is "not contraception". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_family_planning#Not_contraception …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant Zeno's paradox covers this better: nothing touches anything, and the light never reaches your eyes.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant Cool phrase of the day: "gaming causality"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant A friend who fixes wheelchairs told me about this: http://j.mp/1D0Y629Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.