Great, another perfectly good word ruined by JavaScript. http://isomorphic.net/javascript
-
-
Replying to @aphyr
FOR THE RECORD, "X is isomorphic to Y" means loosely "there exists an injective and surjective mapping between X and Y."
6 replies 11 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
.
@chaosprime (IIRC earlier there was a big hullabaloo over scala folks using the word bijective without knowing what it meant either)2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @aphyr
@aphyr@chaosprime my rudimentary understanding is that isomorphism is stricter than bijection, ie it must also preserve structure somehow.8 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @avibryant
@avibryant: I think bijective covers that unless you have a novel definition of structure2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @rcoder
@rcoder well, eg, http://math.stackexchange.com/a/54238 . But I'm in over my head here.
8:57 AM - 9 Feb 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.