It would obviously dramatically change your recruiting profile; the candidate pool would barely even overlap. But what else?
-
-
-
@avibryant why would the pools not overlap? are you saying people would get paid 40% the 40-hour salary? -
@akahn no, but I suspect some combination of somewhat lower pay or perceived higher risk of failure would make it less attractive to many.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@avibryant You mean work just one day a week?!? :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant this is my personal bête noire, literally since 2005, and the #1 reason for all my entrepreneurship and info products.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant@b0rk this is going to be a increasingly common way to attract talent I think, but 16 is lowest I've seen. -
@mykola@avibryant I really wonder how much work / hour you'd get done in 16 hours / week vs 40 -
@mykola@avibryant I feel like it would be more because you could focus so much more, but that's unsubstantiated
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@avibryant (going on the assumption that not everyone is working the same 16 hours)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@avibryant communication would tend towards asynchronous. better documentation, whatever form it takes, would be needed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.