I'd say the most interesting categorization of probabilistic programming languages is the split between "usable today" and "usable someday".
-
-
@avibryant BUGS, JAGS, Stan. -
@johnmyleswhite@avibryant I'd say that PyMC is pretty usable today.. although that may not fall under your definition of language… -
@bmabey@avibryant No, I should have included PyMC in the list. It definitely belongs there. -
@johnmyleswhite@bmabey@avibryant venture is the one I’m most excited to have cross the gap -
@johnmyleswhite@beaucronin@bmabey@avibryant Thanks for the encouragement! we use it now, but are unsure how to stage growth & polish. -
@vmansinghka@johnmyleswhite@beaucronin@bmabey@avibryant A good first step to appeal to applied folks would be to port the Stan examples. -
@tristanzajonc@vmansinghka@beaucronin@bmabey@avibryant Totally agree. Let's see some fast implementations of mixed effects models. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.