Does there exist a hash of a set that won't reveal membership, but which preserves union and intersection operations? /cc @csoghoian
@fdaapproved @vagabondjack ... well, I guess they all have 0 false negatives for membership. But you might actively want a high false +ve.
-
-
@avibryant@vagabondjack yes, then an exercise in choosing a FP rate that still allows useful models to be built. FNs are probably bad.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.