Watching random players play Go on a 203x203 board at 800 moves/second is mesmerizing.
@peterseibel @meangrape ah, there's my answer to the scoring question I guess.
-
-
@avibryant@meangrape Right. Except for a few edge cases, the ancient system and the various modern scoring system give the same result. -
@avibryant@meangrape But still no fitness function because I haven't actually gotten around to implementing the critter part. -
@peterseibel I have some Monte Carlo Tree Search code (not written for Go) that would be fun to adapt to your board interface at some point. -
@avibryant Does that require that you have kind of evaluation function for non-terminal positions? -
@peterseibel no, IIRC it doesn't. -
@avibryant Ah, I must have misunderstood the thing I spent 30 seconds reading. Next time you're in SF we should get together to hack. -
@avibryant: do you mean your work on our ICFP entry? I might be able to walk@peterseibel through that code before you get back to town. -
@rcoder Right on. Or let's just get lunch. I'm still into meeting new people at Twitter and a friend of@avibryant is a friend of mine. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.