FWIW I'm not the one who brought up "citing it". Linking to it is not the same thing as "citing it"
-
-
-
As a lay observer, I understood
@jeremyphoward's "citing" to just mean "referenced as an authority", which could indeed be just a link. I think you're using it in the narrower sense that requires the reference to made by something following the conventions of an academic paper? -
If so, I think this is maybe a microcosm of the broader talking-past-each-other effect I was wanting to highlight. (But I could also be misunderstanding one or both of you).
-
I think you are understanding perfectly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I greatly appreciate
@goodfellow_ian's work too, and recommend his book and papers a number of times in our course, for the record :) However the academic status quo has suited a only tiny percentage of people, who now control and perpetuate it, and I'd like to see much changed -
Do you actually recommend my book? Your intro mentions it only to criticize it: "The deep learning book by Ian Goodfellow et al has similar issues." http://www.fast.ai/2016/10/08/course-background/ … It's OK if you don't want to recommend it, but don't criticize it and then claim you've recommended it
-
We said it is not for "practical deep learning coding". Don't you agree? But I recommend it frequently for other things. My students even organized a book club for your book immediately after part 2 finished. You came to it and presented.
-
I agree the book isn't about coding, but that seems like dodging the question of whether your course recommends it. Your course says what it's not for. Does your course say what it's for?
-
A couple of times
@jeremyphoward recommended the book for the http://fast.ai course. I finished the course , and@goodfellow_ian's book is sitting well used on the shelf in front of me, so reading this conversation is a bit disheartening.pic.twitter.com/hZRnwjEsfK
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They’re good hyperlinks, Ion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So can you have a browser add-on that extracts links and adds them to the bottom of the page in whatever citation style you prefer. Yes, yes you could, if you wrote one or paid for it to be done. Then you just print to pdf and everyone is happy. Submit to archive,org for + points
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haven't seen this format in a lot of academic-oriented sites but this one gives a prescribed attribution https://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts/ffiles/30002.6.shtml … - Su, Francis E., et al. "Medical Tests and Bayes' Theorem." Math Fun Facts. <http://www.math.hmc.edu/funfacts >
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.