When @chesaboudin ran for @SFDAOffice he said he 1.) Wouldn’t prosecute “quality of life crimes 2.) He wanted to find out why drug dealers were doing it and solve their problems 3.) He wanted to get rid of gang enhancements. SF voted him in — and he’s kept his word. https://twitter.com/btraven12/status/1342513973359300608 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@chesaboudin ran against three moderate candidates who split the ticket. RCV has produced some awful results - time to educate the SF electorate.1 reply 5 retweets 33 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @btraven12 @TheMarinaTimes and
Electorate fell for high level messaging that was appealing to some in SF but skipped the details because he had no record and he only won because of ranked choice voting. Slim chance he wins next time now that people have seen in policies in action
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @mikepulliam @btraven12 and
Chesa wins re-election in SF unless he’s found a more prominent role. Woke ain’t changing their vote. D10 gets worse, money launderers. Shaw/CoH control a lot of ballots & they need/want Chesa because drugs addicts & criminals roaming the streets is good for their businesses.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @eyesonfairoaks @mikepulliam and
If you ever want to see that in action, some of Shaw's paid activists on video trying to scare SRO residents that a development they oppose "will bring more police" hmmmmmhttps://www.bluoz.com/blog/2009/11/10/homeless-activists-stopping-development-in-sf/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Also here's a letter/comment once posted on SFGate/Chronicle about Randy Shaw campaign shenanigans related to Jane Kim and Ed Lee. The article is still there but they removed all the comments long ago, so I'm glad I copied ithttps://www.bluoz.com/blog/2011/10/25/allegations-of-Randy-Shaws-voter-tampering/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.