Really proud of my consumer protection team and a big win at the court of appeal: No First Amendment protection for misleading commercial speech aimed and misleading/cheating consumers.https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=31d0fcbb-438c-4188-b9ac-36288a7e0af1 …
This at the same time SF requires employers to hire convicted felons https://sfgov.org/olse/fair-chance-ordinance-fco … On top of changing the language itself from 'convicted felon' to 'justice involved' So which is more misleading, Homeadvisor or the City of SF?