The people who label you a “science denier” for being skeptical of Global Warming/ Climate Change are usually the same people who believe there are more than 2 genders.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It appears that all that emanates from the OZ is toxic verbal diarrhoea, the sooner the carbon dioxide consumes all your hacks and Murdoch the better this world would be.
-
The evidence has been there for years, but, Alarmist are the only ones that get funding and promotion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some common sense research at long last.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bullshit climate change is real just look at what mother nature is doing to the earth....aust has 4 different seasons at the same time but in different parts which we never use to have....explain y u dumb people who think climate change is over rated
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only be to the
#media.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Note - warming needs to be limited within 1.2~1.5°C to save the Great Barrier Reefhttp://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/warming-limit-of-12-degrees-needed-to-save-great-barrier-reef-expert-panel-20170728-gxkwph.html …
-
Also worth noting Graham Lloyd’s editorial decision: headline, what he emphasised, omitted, paraphrased, ...https://www.yahoo.com/news/worst-case-global-warming-scenarios-not-credible-study-210401411.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Misleading your readers,
@australian. It tightened the certainty band of climate sensitivity to around 2.8•. That's almost exactly the IPCC figure.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The article sounds quite balanced and reasonable. Whatever one thinks about this science, we need to get past digging up big hunks of the planet and burning it to make power. Just seems such a stupidly crude way of doing things! Come on USA; innovate us the hell out of this!

-
The title is misleading. The study confirms IPCC estimates (ECS 2.8•) but narrows the certainty band.
-
Somewhat misleading headline; I agree. It is necessary to read the article which does say as you suggest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No shit?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.