There are a lot of articles about earthquakes, soft soil, and Mexico City. Their common subtext is "dumb/silly Mexicans should know better!"
-
-
The story of how we got Mexico City is relatively recent history. It's the result of violent/foolish colonization, based on racist hatred.
Show this thread -
Look at the buildings that were destroyed in Mexico City *and* the buildings that weren't: Catholic churches damaged. Aztec pyramids intact.
Show this thread -
So many white writers are pointing out that Mexico City was built on soft soil. But they fail to mention that colonization made it that way.
Show this thread -
"Mexico City is like building on Jello!" they write. How did it get that way? Bc Europeans destroyed a lake like they destroyed a people.
Show this thread -
Writing about earthquakes/soft soil/Mexico City without explicitly writing about colonization is a second erasure, a legacy of colonization.
Show this thread -
When your subtext is that Mexicans are dumb/silly for building in Mexico City, you're reifying the violence of colonization.
Show this thread -
*Fellow writers, and white ones especially: please don't steal my thread to write a new article as if you knew this all along. Thank you.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, here is a very reliable history of the lake(s) in CDMX: https://twitter.com/i/moments/893612253303517184 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.