Nature, supposedly a science journal, writes there was "racially charged violence" in Charlottesville. No. It was white supremacist murder.
-
-
Show this thread
-
They literally wrote that removing white supremacist statues "risks whitewashing history."pic.twitter.com/WLU2spU8Nm
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nature apologised for the original editorial & offence caused. It’s been changed & a public apology posted:http://go.nature.com/2j4TWZX
-
We saw the change. It still says "Sims was far from the only doctor experimenting on slaves in 1849". It still misidentifies whitewashing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
horror doc description: "their acheivdme saved the lives of black and white woman alike" is.this.real?
-
Yeah I'd like to see the numbers after they quantify that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Never trust Nature mag again. How can you be so utterly stupid to think history and culture are defined by STATUES & awards?
-
Did you read the updated article?
-
Just did. Thanks. It changed in the past few minutes. The strong negative reaction gives me hope that our 2/3 rational majority will be OK.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
https://twitter.com/compatibilism/status/905494956780879872 … pretty good response in the atlantic too
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I just saw an update.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Y'know, I always wondered about that giant statue of Bin Laden at Ground Zero. "Maybe somebody is offended by it?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The original version of this article was offensive and" has been edited
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
jesus
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.