So... this. I'll take the questions in good faith, and will try to answer them briefly.https://twitter.com/icocoboco/status/869938768148652032 …
-
-
Here's one more, with the same climate debt framing:https://www.thenation.com/article/typhoon-haiyan-global-poor-bear-deadly-brunt-climate-change/ …
-
But implicit in your response,
@icocoboco, is this idea that China is the great big polluter. Let's take a critical look at this myth. -
For starters, China and Chinese people are typically cast as a national security threat. This goes back to the Chinese Exclusion Act.
-
The idea that China is the big bad polluter is inextricably tied to fear of the other. We shouldn't ignore that when we talk about climate.
-
And, when it comes to numbers, we need to consider who is and isn't counted when it comes to carbon emissions. Because a lot isn't counted.
-
Who's a bigger polluter: China or the Pentagon? Do we have hard numbers for the Pentagon's carbon emissions? In the past and/or the present?
-
Has any international or even national conversation about climate change seriously considered the Pentagon's emissions? Nope.
-
And let's take China on its own. Yes, it emits a lot of carbon. Why? Because we, the United States, have outsourced our pollution there.
-
I'm typing this on a Logitch keyboard, made in China. Connected to a MacBook, made in China. This required a lot of carbon emissions.
-
If we were fair, we'd count emissions from the manufacture of goods we consume as our emissions, not China's. But we're not exactly fair.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.