But it's not. It's bombing an airfield where they launched chemical weapons on their own people.https://twitter.com/aurabogado/status/850202341978406912 …
I only have so much time to ask the same question. Third try, yes or no: Should the US be bombed for our violations of international law?
-
-
I have plenty of time to acknowledge false equivalency of situations of national security.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we were on the same level of heinous action on our own people, I would not be surprised if another country like China retaliated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You've seen the damage Assad and this civil war has done, you know it's not the same thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't trivialize their suffering with blanket statements like bombs are bad.
-
Ok so I'm not going to ask a fourth time. If you think US has moral imperative to bomb Muslim-majority countries, we're not going to agree.
-
If you believe that is the premise of why they're bombing an oppressive government's military posts in the first place, you're lost here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We are doing the FSA and the people of Syria a great service here and you're worried about semantics because we were the one's to do it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.