But it's not. It's bombing an airfield where they launched chemical weapons on their own people.https://twitter.com/aurabogado/status/850202341978406912 …
So the US *should* be bombed, since we're violating international protocol?
-
-
I can attest that the US should face repercussions for certain actions. If those are military offensives, other countries will hesitate.
-
China has the capacity to bomb the US. Do you agree it should use its troops/technology to do so for our violations of international law?
-
Do you believe they're prepared for the retaliation that comes with it? I don't think these Red Herrings are helping your argument.
-
I only have so much time to ask the same question. Third try, yes or no: Should the US be bombed for our violations of international law?
-
I have plenty of time to acknowledge false equivalency of situations of national security.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So to falsely conflate this argument for you, the solution isn't always bombing, there are passive ways. In this case, Assad deserves it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.