The clear part in the middle? The hoops of hair (not ribbons adorning hair)? That's Hopi.... no matter what George Lucas says.pic.twitter.com/BpXkrICd0n
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Read for yourself how this woman's family took land from indigenous peoples as they settled northern Mexico. http://delarochahistory.com/?page_id=7364 pic.twitter.com/rfSVRzcjsB
That doesn't take away that Clara de la Rocha fought in the Mexican Revolution. But it's not like she was indigenous. She was no peasant.
CC @Pochdigeno, who tweeted at me that they're a geneticist, implying that Clara de la Rocha was indigenous. Right.
Clara de la Rocha's family was so rich they filled and entire library with gold and silver. Revolution, tho. Tuh.pic.twitter.com/sx3KHODBWY
Where did all that gold and silver come from? From the same indigenous peoples who were killed and displaced. Resources. Land. Life.
So @UnsettledCity's viral FB post is about a Mexican revolutionary woman. A *very* rich woman who's European family settled northern Mexico.
Lost in all of that? Hopi women. Hopi girls. Erased in preference for a tidy narrative about revolution... that lacks nuance.
I'll add one more thing and get back to my Saturday: Clara de la Rocha does not represent all Mexican revolutionary women, of course.
There were lots of indigenous women who were part of the Mexican Revolution. But different women fought for different things. Again: nuance.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.