You know, someone could critique the points in @rosariodawson's letter to @DoloresHuerta. This thing in The Guardian, tho, is not that.
-
-
Replying to @aurabogado
Here's what I'm referring to. This isn't a critique of Dawson's points... this is someone's hurt over a hero: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/27/rosario-dawson-dolores-huerta-bernie-sanders …
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
This piece in The Guardian also questions
@rosariodawson latinidad. Rather than say Dawson is latina, it says she's "latino ancestors."1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
Why does it matter that
@rosariodawson is Puerto Rican/Cuban? Does that make her less latina? Less capable of critiquing@DoloresHuerta? No.3 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
I'm similarly concerned with thE notion that
@rosariodawson doesn't have her own style—that she's just copIES Bernie Sanders. Ummm... WHA???1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
Yes,
@rosariodawson can speak for herself. She's capable of having opinions—and super smart opinions at that!1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
Further,
@rosariodawson never said "the UFW are a bunch of corrupt sell-outs." This is the part of The Guardian thing that... just... ugh.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Literally, @rosariodawson wrote that she wants "to have a robust and honest conversation." Why twist that into something she didn't write?
-
-
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@rosariodawson I suspected it'd be bad from the "How dare" title. As if the young can't ever question someone older.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.