You know, someone could critique the points in @rosariodawson's letter to @DoloresHuerta. This thing in The Guardian, tho, is not that.
-
-
I'm similarly concerned with thE notion that
@rosariodawson doesn't have her own style—that she's just copIES Bernie Sanders. Ummm... WHA??? -
Yes,
@rosariodawson can speak for herself. She's capable of having opinions—and super smart opinions at that! -
Further,
@rosariodawson never said "the UFW are a bunch of corrupt sell-outs." This is the part of The Guardian thing that... just... ugh. -
Literally,
@rosariodawson wrote that she wants "to have a robust and honest conversation." Why twist that into something she didn't write? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@aurabogado To this point, she was addressing the question of stakes regarding immigration. Still, I completely agree with you. -
Yeah, you're right for sure. But it's also a way of saying "She's Cuban and therefor conservative and inconsequential."
@bodega_gyro_ao -
@aurabogado Def. Also, calling her Latinidad into question is a reprehensible. But it plays well in the theater of the white gaze. -
@aurabogado *reprehensible tactic
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aurabogado the whole "she's Cuban/PRican so she doesn't know Latinx struggle" idea is
.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.