Here's what I'm referring to. This isn't a critique of Dawson's points... this is someone's hurt over a hero: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/27/rosario-dawson-dolores-huerta-bernie-sanders …
-
-
-
This piece in The Guardian also questions
@rosariodawson latinidad. Rather than say Dawson is latina, it says she's "latino ancestors." -
Why does it matter that
@rosariodawson is Puerto Rican/Cuban? Does that make her less latina? Less capable of critiquing@DoloresHuerta? No. -
I'm similarly concerned with thE notion that
@rosariodawson doesn't have her own style—that she's just copIES Bernie Sanders. Ummm... WHA??? -
Yes,
@rosariodawson can speak for herself. She's capable of having opinions—and super smart opinions at that! -
Further,
@rosariodawson never said "the UFW are a bunch of corrupt sell-outs." This is the part of The Guardian thing that... just... ugh. -
Literally,
@rosariodawson wrote that she wants "to have a robust and honest conversation." Why twist that into something she didn't write? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@aurabogado also I'm not here for the Huerta is beyond reproach crowdThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.