It wasn't like @ErikaChristakis just wrote a quick, "I don't really agree with this" email. She went in with like 800 words. It's horrid.
-
-
2) Erika Christakis could've protected free speech in the original campus email asking students not to be racist on Halloween. She didn't.
-
3) Free speech is usually a reflexive term used to defend racism and misogyny—not all speech.
-
4) The same students standing behind the free speech banner online at the Overheard FB page are censoring the students they disagree with.
-
5) Some of the free speech people are using the term to defend genocidal statements, like "wiped out an Indian village."
-
6) The Christakis have issued an email to Sillimanders; part of it reads "we understand that it was hurtful to you, and we are truly sorry."
-
7) The email still stresses free speech. Even though that's not what this is about.
-
8) Lots people deserve apologies here. Sincere ones—that don't bury the very real issue of racism into a pretend debate about free speech.
-
Along with everyone else, I just got an email from President Salovey. Sigh. Deep, deep sigh.
-
Your free speech is sometimes hate speech. Hence the reluctance to defend it.
-
The unbearable whiteness of white Yale alumni writing all the white explainers about white racism there. They still don't get it. Damn.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.