There's so much investment in the idea that, if you know your rights, you'll be protected. This clearly doesn't apply to people of color.
-
-
Sandra Bland also knew that she was supposed to be able to smoke a cigarette if she damn well pleased. She wasn't interfering with anyone.
-
Sandra Bland also knew that she had the right to remains in her car, because she wasn't posing any threat to Trooper Encinia.
-
Sandra Bland knew that Trooper Encinia had no right to arrest her—she made no arrest-able offense whatsoever.
-
Sandra Bland knew she had the right to record her interaction with Trooper Encinia.
-
Sandra Bland knew hat she had the right to take legal action against Trooper Encinia, and told him she couldn't wait to see him in court.
-
Sandra Bland knew all her rights, first as a black woman—a human being—and as a citizen of the United States. She expressed this knowledge.
-
Sandra Bland articulated her legal entitlements as a free person in the U.S. Or, at least, what those entitlements are supposed to be.
-
But knowing those rights means nothing for many people of color—and for black people in particular. Those rights can be vanished.
-
The precedence for alienable rights is rooted in the Fugitive Slave Act. A person's skin color indicated the potential to suspend rights.
-
For white people, these rights are just that: rights. For black people, these rights are conditional, and always subject to challenge.
-
Maybe it's less about getting black people to know their rights—and more about getting everyone else to acknowledge black people have them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.