@gayle I'm reading these other examples you're providing as a derail to my original argument: I think I deserve to be seen.
-
-
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado However, when you tell me what must be going on in my head — that I disagree with. Because you're incorrect.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado When I say "X and Y are ___", I am absolutely including things that are both X and Y.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@gayle The US recognizes discrimination against X. The US recognizes discrimination against Y. The US fails to recognize that XY exists.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aurabogado
@gayle But you claim that you already understand this, so I'll take my free labor elsewhere. Have a good night.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado I am very willing to adjust my language and I appreciate you giving me an alternative.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gayle
Aura Bogado Retweeted Aura Bogado
@gayle If you're willing to adjust your language, you'd consider the alternative I already suggested:https://twitter.com/aurabogado/status/569293431626993664 …Aura Bogado added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado That's fine for that one instance. What about when I want to include "female or disabled or a person of color or a fat person"?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado Ok. I'm sorry I've seemed to upset you. I appreciate your answering the questions you were willing/able to. Thx for your time.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.