Wow. So @washingtonpost also runs this piece backing Hillary Clinton's decision to defend a child rapist: http://wapo.st/1nvQihu
-
-
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@washingtonpost If Hillary had represented Gitmo detainees, would you make similar objections? What about death penalty defense?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carltakei
@carltakei Did you just compare a child rapist to GITMO detainees?@washingtonpost1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@washingtonpost EVERYONE has right to zealous defense. Choosing only "worthy" defendants --> injustice. Can argue about... (1/2)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carltakei
@aurabogado@washingtonpost ..methods of defense, but rep'ing person accused of awful crime w/in ethical limits is worthy of respect. (2/2)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carltakei
@carltakei So writing an affidavit that a child exaggerated her RAPE is ethical? No. It's not.@washingtonpost1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@washingtonpost If she had factual basis, it was ethical to ask for more info. Period.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carltakei
@carltakei I'm disgusted that you would even come at me with this. And I'm disgusted that you stand by victim blaming.@washingtonpost1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@washingtonpost I stand by zealous defense. Too many ppl are wrongly convicted. Defense attys are the only protection from this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@carltakei Well, hooray for the ACLU attorney repeatedly telling a rape survivor that victim blaming is ethical. Now leave me alone.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.