@PaintsNature while I don't think something magical happens at 18 that makes someone understand consent, I know it doesn't exist at 14.
-
-
Replying to @FatGirlvsWorld
@FatGirlvsWorld I would say that is very close to the line. I never said there was consent in the Montana case but people have inferred that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaintsNature
@PaintsNature the judge seemed to imply that she was a siren, a willing Lolita. And while he retracted it, he said it. V. Dangerous assertn.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @PaintsNature
.
@PaintsNature@FatGirlvsWorld Bullshit. You wrote that the judge was sadly 'tarred and feathered.' I'm so beyond disgusted by you.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado@FatGirlvsWorld My concern was not for the judge's feeling, but for the lack of ability of people to discuss the issue calmly.5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @theonlyadult
@theonlyadult@PaintsNature@aurabogado I think "constructively" would be a better term. We can do tjat wothout the name calling.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
.@FatGirlvsWorld @theonlyadult @PaintsNature 1) I never called anyone a name; stop suggesting that I did.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.