@aurabogado im sure youre not using the term "child" for sensitizing the situation. Either that or your just uneducated. #ZimmermanTrial
-
-
-
@CaptainAm82 Don't you dare question my education. You're the one who can't even use Google effectively. -
@aurabogado you showed your education level when you decided to sensitize the situation by using incorrect terminology#ZimmermanTrial -
@CaptainAm82 Second time: LEAVE ME ALONE.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aurabogado the legal definition of a child n. 1) a person's natural offspring. 2) a person 14 years and under.#ZimmermanTrial -
@CaptainAm82 Wow, you can use Google poorly. A child is "a human being below the age of 18 years." Pay attention, and stop trolling. -
@aurabogado no it is not. You just got the definition. You must not be able to read. A child is separated from a minor
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@aurabogado A "child" should be distinguished from a "minor" who is anyone under 18 in almost all states." In quote#ZimmermanTrialThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.