@IndianCountry contradicts @NYTimes report on tribal sovereignty provisions in #VAWA. Who's right? @aurabogado http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/02/28/violence-against-women-act-tribal-provisions-passes-house-president-obama-signature#.US-ZC2ji8GU.twitter …
-
-
Replying to @andEps
@andEps@indiancountry@nytimes I'm confused. Aren't they both reporting that VAWA passed with tribal sovereignty provisions?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado they report the bill "stripped certain provisions regarding Native American women on reservations." http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/us/politics/congress-passes-reauthorization-of-violence-against-women-act.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aurabogado
@aurabogado awesome. thanks for the clarification. i must've misread the piece.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.