"non sequitur" is rapidly becoming my reply to CFP submissions based on the abstract alone. don't fall into that trap.
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Anything amusingly terrible this year?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder
@CiPHPerCoder implying one or two? no. a LOT are... but i can't speak about it =(1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Of course. Just wanted the meta data ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder
@CiPHPerCoder i wish i had cycles to track that =( i've long wanted to do such metrics1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg Construct a bloom filter of people/companies who only waste reviewers' time, across different cons? :)2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CiPHPerCoder
@CiPHPerCoder@attritionorg I would be all for it2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @raistolo
@raistolo @CiPHPerCoder i got bitched at for my super-vague tweets on CFP, despite being on 3 CFP teams.
11:23 PM - 14 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.