@attritionorg I don't get it. Oracle says they don't agree with her. But she claims they threaten researchers on EULA grounds.
-
-
Replying to @CharlieEriksen
@attritionorg So if they don't agree with her, then why are they supposedly threatening legitimate researchers? Actions speak louder, etc.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CharlieEriksen
.
@CharlieEriksen if researchers are being threatened by@oracle for any reason, they need to make it public.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @attritionorg
Charlie Eriksen Retweeted Chris Wysopal
@attritionorg I remember seeing at least a few people in the last bit saying they had gotten the letter. Such as:https://twitter.com/WeldPond/status/631081776442671104 …Charlie Eriksen added,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @CharlieEriksen
@CharlieEriksen hrm,@weldpond, can you publish the Oracle "don't break our EULA" letters?1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@CharlieEriksen We have made a decision not to publish the letter.1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes
@WeldPond @CharlieEriksen unfortunate, given how many journos and law wonks are interested in that data, some trying to influence law
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@WeldPond@CharlieEriksen I'd like to see someone stand up for security research vs lawsuit threats :(0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.