So what's the verdict on (ISC)2's new Vulnerability Central?
I'd ask @attritionorg but I'm afraid I already know his views.
@VS_ requires login i believe, but their # of vulns/exploits/etc (as pasted to me earlier) is absurd and unqualified
-
-
@attritionorg That's what I was afraid of. I'll just stick with OSVDB, at least I know it's not GIGO processor. -
@VS_ wish i had time to dig into it, but honestly, they aren't new to this realm. should better disclaim what those numbers mean. -
@attritionorg Agreed. Well, this is the provider of the information: http://www.cytenna.com/ -
@VS_ on surface sounds good but 300k is still very suspect. also no listed names of "internationally recognized cybersecurity professionals" -
@attritionorg Exactly. No names, proprietary algorithms, talk of thousands of feeds. It all adds up to healthy scepticism of their claims.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.