@shoebox @desmondholden @KimZetter @Penenberg research, advocacy, and relief. more aspects that can still help greatly
-
-
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg True, tho I wonder how many people donating know that only 27% will go toward searching for a cure. Perhaps not important.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Penenberg
@Penenberg if the charity isn't suggesting otherwise, all good. people shouldn't assume it is entirely research oriented1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I dunno what people assume about it. So much of the hype involves seeking a cure.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Penenberg
@Penenberg if they are promoting it as 'finding the cure', then 27% is not good1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg@Penenberg I think you have it backwards. 27% looks like overhead. "Program expenses" is stuff they deliver.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jjarmoc
@jjarmoc correct, think@Penenberg is referring to them using 27% of *that* for research.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@jjarmoc @Penenberg i specifically quoted 72.4% as program expenses. done research on charities and that site.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.