@attritionorg LOL, great q. I think I can, but 1st tell me if you agree/disagree w my assertion. @amatwyshyn
-
-
Replying to @SpireSec
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn unless you have a different definition of "techrisk pros" (thus my quotes), I disagree based on anecdotal evidence1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg agreed. I think we need to define that plus "huge" plus "on twitter" right?@amatwyshyn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpireSec
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn even 'majority' means 51% no? "on twitter" i will agree to "has a legit profile" even if not active.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg yes, but I said huge and that should make my job harder - 75% ok? and I'll agree that any Twitter profile works.@amatwyshyn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpireSec
@attritionorg techrisk imo starts with employees in infosec groups of enterprises...@amatwyshyn2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpireSec
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn if you are counting any IDS glass monkey or admin that has security as a component of the job, the # will be higher1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg I do consider it - r u saying that's inappropriate?@amatwyshyn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpireSec
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn i think I would debate the use of "pro" for a certain level of security work.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @attritionorg
@attritionorg u shouldn't denigrate bugfinders that way... oh, u didn't mean... ;-)@amatwyshyn1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SpireSec @amatwyshyn oh I did. some of these XSS and SQLi monkeys are not pros at all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.