@DennisF @e_kaspersky 1. CONTEXT - audience? 2. The Chairwoman understands crackers v. security researchers, but I will pass this along.
@SpireSec @amatwyshyn unless you have a different definition of "techrisk pros" (thus my quotes), I disagree based on anecdotal evidence
-
-
@attritionorg agreed. I think we need to define that plus "huge" plus "on twitter" right?@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn even 'majority' means 51% no? "on twitter" i will agree to "has a legit profile" even if not active. -
@attritionorg yes, but I said huge and that should make my job harder - 75% ok? and I'll agree that any Twitter profile works.@amatwyshyn -
@attritionorg techrisk imo starts with employees in infosec groups of enterprises...@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn if you are counting any IDS glass monkey or admin that has security as a component of the job, the # will be higher -
@attritionorg I do consider it - r u saying that's inappropriate?@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn i think I would debate the use of "pro" for a certain level of security work. -
@attritionorg u shouldn't denigrate bugfinders that way... oh, u didn't mean... ;-)@amatwyshyn - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.