BREAKING: "Hackers seek to exploit vulnerabilities." --FTC chair
@SpireSec @amatwyshyn can you give examples that demonstrate a "huge majority" of "techrisk pros" are not on Twitter?
-
-
@attritionorg LOL, great q. I think I can, but 1st tell me if you agree/disagree w my assertion.@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn unless you have a different definition of "techrisk pros" (thus my quotes), I disagree based on anecdotal evidence -
@attritionorg agreed. I think we need to define that plus "huge" plus "on twitter" right?@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn even 'majority' means 51% no? "on twitter" i will agree to "has a legit profile" even if not active. -
@attritionorg yes, but I said huge and that should make my job harder - 75% ok? and I'll agree that any Twitter profile works.@amatwyshyn -
@attritionorg techrisk imo starts with employees in infosec groups of enterprises...@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@amatwyshyn if you are counting any IDS glass monkey or admin that has security as a component of the job, the # will be higher -
@attritionorg I do consider it - r u saying that's inappropriate?@amatwyshyn - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@attritionorg@SpireSec@amatwyshyn Frost & Sullivan says there are ~6.5M sec/risk pros globally. Only 800 follow me on twitter.#evidence -
@beauwoods@SpireSec@amatwyshyn interesting number. what is the highest follower count for a sec-related feed? -
@attritionorg my new def of techrisk pro is "follower of attritionorg" so that's 12k out of 6.5m ;-)@beauwoods@amatwyshyn -
@SpireSec@attritionorg@amatwyshyn I'll note that for future discussions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.